Sourced deadlines · countdowns computed live
Disclosure deadlines, read from the source.
Disclosure law has dates, and the dates keep moving. Every entry below was read on the regulator's or legislature's own page — not a law-firm summary — and carries its verification date. The countdowns are computed live, in your browser, so this page cannot silently go stale.
Loading the radar…
Two entries exist to correct the record
Most deadline trackers are copy-of-a-copy, and two of the most-copied facts in this field are wrong. Colorado's 2024 AI Act — the one with the famous June 2026 date — was repealed and replaced by SB 26-189, whose duties start 1 January 2027 and concern automated decision-making, not content labels. Texas TRAIGA is routinely described as a labeling law; its enrolled text is an intent-based prohibitions law with sector-specific disclosure duties. Both entries are on the radar, saying exactly that, with the official texts linked — because a radar that only lists real deadlines and stays silent about fake ones still leaves you misinformed.
Frequently asked questions
Why do other trackers show different dates for the same laws?
Because laws move. Colorado's original AI Act was repealed and replaced before its duties ever switched on, yet trackers still list its dead June 2026 date; the EU's Digital Omnibus shifted parts of the AI Act's own timetable in 2026. Every date here is the operative date in the official text as read on the verification date printed on the entry — when a famous date turned out stale, the entry says so and explains what replaced it.
Is this legal advice?
No. This is a sourced reading aid: each entry summarizes what the official text says and links to it so you can read the source yourself. Whether a duty applies to your specific product, company size, or distribution model is a question for the text — and, for real exposure, a lawyer.
How are the countdowns computed?
In your browser, from today's date, against the operative date in the official source — never hard-coded, so the page cannot quietly go stale between verifications. Entries are re-read against their sources on the cycle printed on each card, and a law whose text changes gets its entry rewritten, not patched over.
Which of these actually affect a solo creator?
The EU Article 50 and China entries speak directly to people who publish AI-generated content; California's duties bind the providers and platforms, which reaches creators through the tools and feeds they use; Texas and Colorado are included precisely to correct the record — both are narrower than their reputations, and their entries explain what they actually require.